Page 1 of 1

Coaches for 2016-Dialogue

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:56 pm
by commish
Initially I wanted coaches for this league. They have become less attractive for these reasons:
1. The game gives us layers of detail to program our teams. Even a click of a sabermetric option can do it all in 2 seconds
2. Many of us forget to renew their contracts even with in game warnings. LOL
3. I often fire the stubborn ones because THEY want to control my base stealing. A lot of nerve, I say.


So, if you have thoughts regarding coaches list them below. Remember, we are not voting. Unless I receive a pretty strong 'kick back' on having coaches we will not have them. That said, if you do want please......speak out.

Re: Coaches for 2016-Dialogue

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 2:07 pm
by milwaukee_mike
No coaches please, remembering to renew my scout is enough for me ;)

Re: Coaches for 2016-Dialogue

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 2:08 pm
by Al B
Coaches don't add anything to my enjoyment of OOTP, so I'm with you on this one.

Re: Coaches for 2016-Dialogue

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 3:38 pm
by Dan_thunder_bay
I'm indifferent. Either way I wouldn't mind. Not that hard to manage coaches and resign them but less work if we dont have any.

Re: Coaches for 2016-Dialogue

Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 10:56 pm
by OwenSound_Jason
I prefer No Coaches.
In my opinion, it just makes a league complicated & unstable in game data
without any interest or influence.

Re: Coaches for 2016-Dialogue

Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 11:47 pm
by aef027
I am fine with no coaches.

Re: Coaches for 2016-Dialogue

Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 1:15 pm
by Windsor_Greg
I'm fine with no coaches. In my other league they are more of a pain than anything else.

Re: Coaches for 2016-Dialogue

Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 4:55 pm
by commish
Decision:

The GLBL will not institute coaches. This is not an area that I think we need to revisit in the near future.

Thanks for your comments.